More than a taxpayer has requested that we witnessed in recent years in the profession to be able to sue the government (specifically financial administration) to obtain compensation for damage for the time lost to fix warnings literally good-natured, tax assessments, AUTHORITIES relief of constraints, registration of mortgages and not due entirely wrong in principle.
In this regard it is interesting to a recent ruling by the Court of Cassation (No. 8703 of 09 April 2009 - Hearing, 17.3.2009).
In essence
(amazing, if not shocking!) The taxpayer, resident in Catania, after asking the Justice of Peace through 300 (three hundred) € by way of damages considered "(...) violated the prohibition of NEMINI harm, given the length of red tape, which lasted six months, resulting in disturbance of the "right to peace" of the (taxpayer) making him spend time and energy, including hits "empty" at the counters, repeated requests and reminders, to prove that the sum required of him was not due (...)" was denied by the Supreme Court the amount.
The sentence in fact states that "(...) specie, non sussiste un'ingiustizia costituzionalmente qualificata, tantomeno si verte in un'ipotesi di danno patrimoniale prevista dal legislatore ordinario, risultando, piuttosto, la ritenuta lesione del "diritto alla tranquillità " insuscettibile di essere monetizzata, siccome inquadrabile in quegli sconvolgimenti quotidiani "consistenti in disagi, fastidi, disappunti, ansie ed in ogni altro di insoddisfazione" (c.d. bagatellari) ritenuti non meritevoli di tutela risarcitoria(...)" .
Insomma: richiesta di risarcimento rigettata. Ovvero armarsi di pazienza.
