Author: Yupa
Source: Mag Mell
Let's do some 'of morality, it should be'! The premise
. Who says babies can not stand : I have always found them useless and stupid . Yet unsightly. Statements, these, they are worth the glares of normal people, among others. Worse
babies, though, there are adults who foolishly interact with infants.
But other than that ...
few days ago on the site of Corriere della Sera see a notice from the following title ...
not interested in the content of the piece , its possible "scientific truth". Maybe it's all a lie. And it was all (or almost) true, the news has been reported variously in the wrong way and / or inaccurate, as is common practice journalism in general. What matters is
the idea that the title and abstract not so hide: the reason why the news is reported. And how. The baby cries
. She cries too much. And the thing is a problem . And why is this a problem? Maybe because he's evil? Why suffer? Because evidence of discomfort? Why is it haunted? No! It is a problem because it threatens his future . This does not count. Risks becoming out of the norm . And it can get out of the norm? Intelligence? Yes, but this is not the point! May not have the intelligence to apply to that one thing that, apparently, may be of importance for the future of the baby: the standard teaching, study, school. The production of votes, the performance of duty curriculum, to achieve minimum targets for the storage of knowledge (knowledge is often of dubious value, o quantomeno interesse per il singolo).
Quasi a suggerire che.
Che, ad esempio, se il pianto o, meglio, la sofferenza prolungata non producesse questi effetti nefasti, allora ce ne potremmo tranquillamente fregare.
Ma si può andare anche un po’ piú in là. E se, putacaso, scoprissimo un nesso contrario, se scoprissimo che tormenti intensi e prolungati nel bambino giovano all’intelligenza o, meglio, all’apprendimento scolastico? A quel punto che si fa? Stabiliamo delle dosi pedagogiche standard di dolore da infliggere per il bene futuro dell’individuo? Ma dopotutto, dopotutto è quello che già si è fatto a lungo, nei decenni, dal secolare potere assoluto del pater familias up to corporal punishment. The reason is just that: "It's for your own good." And now we discover that there are those who cry too much it hurts. But why do not suffer. It hurts because it is detrimental to future productivity. But is this really the motivation you need to do not suffer another individual?
Link: http://magmell.splinder.com/post/17240757/Ngeeeeh% 21 +% 21 Ngeeeeh
0 comments:
Post a Comment